XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L
XXSC.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C) and XDNS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XXSC.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR, while XDNS.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XXSC.L returned 8.44%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for XDNS.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XXSC.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XDNS.L.
Performance
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXSC.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than XDNS.L's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XXSC.L has underperformed XDNS.L with an annualized return of 8.44%, while XDNS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.68% annualized return.
XXSC.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
XDNS.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XXSC.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C | 6.58% | 22.28% | 0.76% | 10.44% | -17.50% | 15.39% | 10.55% | 24.87% | -14.91% | 23.58% |
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 15.48% | 16.58% | 9.87% | 11.58% | -7.42% | 1.12% | 12.12% | 14.51% | -10.22% | 14.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXSC.L and XDNS.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015 | 0.48 |
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Financial Services
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Real Estate
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Basic Materials
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Technology
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Healthcare
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Energy
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
-
Communication Services
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Consumer Defensive
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Utilities
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XXSC.L
XDNS.L
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XXSC.L | XDNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.39 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 3.81 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 11.43 | -6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXSC.L | XDNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.09 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.68 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.60 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXSC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, which is greater than XDNS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXSC.L and XDNS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXSC.L | XDNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.12% | -24.75% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -10.70% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | -14.32% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -19.29% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -24.75% | -10.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.57% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -5.35% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.04% | -1.02% |
Volatility
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXSC.L | XDNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.89% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 14.64% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 19.56% | -7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 17.83% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 17.31% | -1.04% |
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXSC.L vs. XDNS.L - Dividend Comparison
XXSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D | 1.43% | 1.63% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.83% | 1.46% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.20% | 1.97% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
XXSC.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXSC.L and XDNS.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDNS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDNS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XXSC.L.
XXSC.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XDNS.L is Japan Equities. XXSC.L tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR, while XDNS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XXSC.L and 0.15% for XDNS.L.
Find the right allocation for XXSC.L and XDNS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer