XXSC.L vs. EMIM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L).
XXSC.L and EMIM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XXSC.L is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR. It was launched on Jan 17, 2008. EMIM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both XXSC.L and EMIM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XXSC.L or EMIM.L.
Key characteristics
XXSC.L | EMIM.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 4.70% | 5.81% |
1Y Return | 15.24% | 8.55% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -1.60% | -0.05% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 5.39% | 3.69% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 8.14% | 5.27% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.11 | 0.73 |
Daily Std Dev | 13.63% | 12.48% |
Max Drawdown | -35.12% | -31.70% |
Current Drawdown | -7.92% | -8.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXSC.L and EMIM.L is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XXSC.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XXSC.L achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 5.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XXSC.L has outperformed EMIM.L with an annualized return of 8.14%, while EMIM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.27% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XXSC.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XXSC.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XXSC.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XXSC.L nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XXSC.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXSC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXSC.L and EMIM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XXSC.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) have volatilities of 3.98% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.