PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XXSC.L is traded in GBp, while 6AQQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 6AQQ.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXSC.L achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XXSC.L has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 8.98%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.36% annualized return.


XXSC.L

1D
1.71%
1M
1.40%
YTD
6.17%
6M
8.47%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
8.98%

6AQQ.DE

1D
2.49%
1M
0.69%
YTD
17.02%
6M
17.66%
1Y
38.56%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
18.04%
10Y*
22.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
6.17%22.28%0.76%10.44%-17.50%15.39%10.55%24.37%-14.57%23.35%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
17.02%12.65%27.94%48.51%-26.12%29.77%42.33%35.47%4.69%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XXSC.L and 6AQQ.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010

0.55

The correlation between XXSC.L and 6AQQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXSC.L
XXSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XXSC.L6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.43

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

9.80

-5.36

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXSC.L and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXSC.L drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXSC.L and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXSC.L6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.17%

-27.56%

-46.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-11.02%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-25.16%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-27.56%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

-27.56%

-8.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-2.95%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-4.54%

-16.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.86%

-0.82%

Volatility

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) is 3.81%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that XXSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXSC.L6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

5.54%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

11.32%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

15.69%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

19.47%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

19.62%

-1.31%

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXSC.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXSC.L nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XXSC.L and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XXSC.L.

XXSC.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. XXSC.L tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XXSC.L and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXSC.L and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer