XXRP vs. AAXJ
XXRP (Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF) and AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Teucrium, while AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. XXRP is actively managed, while AAXJ is passively managed. Over the past year, XXRP returned -90.01% vs 54.70% for AAXJ. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XXRP charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AAXJ.
Performance
XXRP vs. AAXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXRP achieves a -71.31% return, which is significantly lower than AAXJ's 29.50% return.
XXRP
- 1D
- -5.54%
- 1M
- -33.90%
- YTD
- -71.31%
- 6M
- -79.17%
- 1Y
- -90.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAXJ
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 29.50%
- 6M
- 32.24%
- 1Y
- 54.70%
- 3Y*
- 24.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
XXRP vs. AAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | -71.31% | -56.74% |
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 29.50% | 46.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXRP and AAXJ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXRP vs. AAXJ — Risk / Return Rank
XXRP
AAXJ
XXRP vs. AAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XXRP | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.49 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 4.02 | -4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 15.52 | -16.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXRP | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | 2.71 | -3.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.28 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
XXRP vs. AAXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXRP drawdown since its inception was -95.46%, which is greater than AAXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXRP and AAXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXRP | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.46% | -49.37% | -46.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.46% | -13.66% | -81.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.46% | -2.32% | -93.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.75% | -14.03% | -45.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.46% | 3.53% | +67.93% |
Volatility
XXRP vs. AAXJ - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) has a higher volatility of 27.68% compared to iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) at 8.95%. This indicates that XXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXRP | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.68% | 8.95% | +18.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.81% | 17.53% | +87.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 149.61% | 20.30% | +129.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.96% | 19.95% | +126.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.96% | 20.25% | +125.71% |
XXRP vs. AAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXRP has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than AAXJ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXRP vs. AAXJ - Dividend Comparison
XXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.76%, more than AAXJ's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.40% | 1.81% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.74% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% |
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF | 22.76% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXRP and AAXJ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XXRP has higher volatility (27.68%) compared to AAXJ (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXRP dropped -95.46% vs AAXJ's -49.37%.
On 1-year performance, AAXJ leads with 54.70% vs -90.01% for XXRP. On fees, AAXJ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, AAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAXJ has performed better with a 54.70% return vs -90.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAXJ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XXRP.
XXRP has the higher dividend yield at 22.76%, compared with 1.40% for AAXJ.
XXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while AAXJ is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.89% for XXRP and 0.68% for AAXJ.
AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XXRP and AAXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer