XX25.L vs. CEBG.L
XX25.L (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and CEBG.L (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China NR USD, from Xtrackers and VanEck respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XX25.L returned 16.17%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CEBG.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XX25.L is traded in GBp, while CEBG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CEBG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XX25.L achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than CEBG.L's -5.78% return.
XX25.L
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
CEBG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -6.28%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XX25.L Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 14.21% | 17.72% | 29.08% | -18.23% | -11.14% | -2.34% |
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -5.78% | 15.45% | 1.26% | -14.25% | -19.48% | -21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XX25.L and CEBG.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XX25.L and CEBG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XX25.L
CEBG.L
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XX25.L) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XX25.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.08 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 0.44 | +5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | 0.93 | +14.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XX25.L drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, which is greater than CEBG.L's maximum drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XX25.L and CEBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XX25.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.38% | -57.08% | -42.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.21% | -14.08% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.85% | -29.32% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.42% | -40.55% | +24.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.78% | -39.55% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 6.64% | -4.05% |
Volatility
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XX25.L) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) at 3.61%. This indicates that XX25.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XX25.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 3.61% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 10.69% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 15.89% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 27.10% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 27.10% | -1.00% |
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XX25.L and CEBG.L have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
XX25.L vs. CEBG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XX25.L nor CEBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XX25.L and CEBG.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XX25.L and CEBG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
Both ETFs track MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for XX25.L and CEBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer