XWLD.L vs. VT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XWLD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - XWLD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XWLD.L returned 13.92%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for VT. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XWLD.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

XWLD.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XWLD.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XWLD.L is traded in GBp, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWLD.L achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 13.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XWLD.L having a 13.92% annualized return and VT not far behind at 13.56%.

XWLD.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 5.10%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 27.30%
• 3Y*: 17.69%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 13.92%

VT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 6M: 12.60%
• 1Y: 30.67%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 13.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWLD.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XWLD.L Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C	10.22%	12.59%	21.09%	17.58%	-8.42%	23.71%	12.15%	23.21%	-3.74%	11.80%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	13.11%	13.71%	18.53%	15.92%	-8.25%	19.39%	13.16%	21.99%	-4.41%	13.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XWLD.L and VT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2014	0.65

The correlation between XWLD.L and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

XWLD.L vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XWLD.L	VT
Technology	28.3%	27.8%
Financial Services	15.7%	15.9%
Industrials	11.4%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	9.5%
Communication Services	9.3%	8.3%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.8%
Energy	4.2%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.3%	4.2%
Utilities	2.7%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.4%

Return for Risk

XWLD.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWLD.L

XWLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
XWLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XWLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XWLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XWLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XWLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWLD.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XWLD.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XWLD.L	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	2.72	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	3.58	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.52	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	4.08	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.43	16.91	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XWLD.L vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWLD.L and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XWLD.L	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	2.72	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	0.87	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96	0.82	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.60	+0.30

Drawdowns

XWLD.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWLD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWLD.L and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XWLD.L	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.62%	-31.81%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.55%	-7.55%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.00%	-17.91%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.00%	-17.91%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.62%	-26.93%	+0.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.15%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-4.54%	+1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	1.82%	-0.16%

Volatility

XWLD.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XWLD.L) is 2.50%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that XWLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XWLD.L	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	3.06%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.29%	8.65%	-1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.16%	11.33%	-1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.27%	14.12%	-0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.56%	16.54%	-1.98%

XWLD.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWLD.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XWLD.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

XWLD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%
XWLD.L Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XWLD.L and VT in my portfolio?

XWLD.L and VT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XWLD.L or VT?

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XWLD.L or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XWLD.L.

What is the main difference between XWLD.L and VT?

XWLD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWLD.L and 0.06% for VT.