XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L
XWFS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) and XXTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XWFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XXTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWFS.L returned 15.66% vs 53.00% for XXTW.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWFS.L achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than XXTW.L's 24.48% return.
XWFS.L
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 15.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXTW.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 24.48%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- 1Y
- 53.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XWFS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C | 0.60% | 20.20% | 29.08% | 9.26% |
XXTW.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF | 24.48% | 13.82% | 36.21% | 14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWFS.L and XXTW.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWFS.L
XXTW.L
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWFS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.45 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.14 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 8.22 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWFS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.73 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.52 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum XXTW.L drawdown of -28.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWFS.L and XXTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWFS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -28.44% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -16.79% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -2.31% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -5.02% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 6.43% | -3.42% |
Volatility
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) is 3.40%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that XWFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWFS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 6.76% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 14.37% | -4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 19.30% | -6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 21.48% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 21.48% | -5.44% |
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XWFS.L and XXTW.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWFS.L vs. XXTW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWFS.L nor XXTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWFS.L and XXTW.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWFS.L and XXTW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XWFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while XXTW.L is Technology Equities. XWFS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index.
Find the right allocation for XWFS.L and XXTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer