XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L
XWFS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) and X7PS.L (Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XWFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while X7PS.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XWFS.L returned 10.11%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for X7PS.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XWFS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PS.L.
Performance
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XWFS.L is traded in GBP, while X7PS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the X7PS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWFS.L achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than X7PS.L's 13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XWFS.L has underperformed X7PS.L with an annualized return of 10.11%, while X7PS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.
XWFS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
X7PS.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 47.90%
- 3Y*
- 43.02%
- 5Y*
- 31.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XWFS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C | 9.22% | 20.20% | 29.08% | 10.02% | -25.32% | 27.92% | -3.00% | 26.44% | -17.64% | 22.75% |
X7PS.L Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 13.65% | 87.84% | 27.12% | 23.19% | 5.63% | 30.02% | -18.45% | 7.52% | -25.50% | 16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWFS.L and X7PS.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2011 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XWFS.L and X7PS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWFS.L
X7PS.L
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XWFS.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.97 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 9.92 | -8.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.04%, smaller than the maximum X7PS.L drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWFS.L and X7PS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWFS.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.04% | -56.34% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.08% | -16.07% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.08% | -18.22% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.69% | -30.73% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.04% | -56.34% | +12.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.19% | -2.58% | -10.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -14.49% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.35% | 4.81% | +13.54% |
Volatility
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) is 3.03%, while Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that XWFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWFS.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 5.51% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 18.93% | -8.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.97% | 22.34% | +21.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.12% | 23.77% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 24.61% | -0.71% |
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than X7PS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWFS.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWFS.L nor X7PS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWFS.L and X7PS.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, X7PS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X7PS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWFS.L.
XWFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while X7PS.L is Europe Equities. XWFS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while X7PS.L tracks STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWFS.L and 0.20% for X7PS.L.
Find the right allocation for XWFS.L and X7PS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer