PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XWEQ.DE is traded in EUR, while LDGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDGL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XWEQ.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
2.68%
YTD
9.71%
6M
11.10%
1Y
23.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LDGL.L

1D
0.13%
1M
2.26%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XWEQ.DE and LDGL.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWEQ.DE
XWEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XWEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

LDGL.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWEQ.DELDGL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWEQ.DELDGL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.64

-0.75

Drawdowns

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -7.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEQ.DE and LDGL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWEQ.DELDGL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.80%

-7.52%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.28%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-2.06%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWEQ.DELDGL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

13.78%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

13.78%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

13.78%

+1.40%

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWEQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XWEQ.DE vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison

XWEQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XWEQ.DE and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LDGL.L.

XWEQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while LDGL.L is Global Equity Income. XWEQ.DE tracks MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEQ.DE and 0.29% for LDGL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWEQ.DE and LDGL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer