PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWEQ.DE achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than CBUI.DE's 20.05% return.


XWEQ.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
4.22%
YTD
9.71%
6M
11.49%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBUI.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
8.37%
YTD
20.05%
6M
22.81%
1Y
44.12%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XWEQ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C
9.71%4.46%25.97%0.47%
CBUI.DE
iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
20.05%20.98%13.82%7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XWEQ.DE and CBUI.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2023

0.78

The correlation between XWEQ.DE and CBUI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWEQ.DE
XWEQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XWEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWEQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUI.DE
CBUI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XWEQ.DECBUI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.60

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

6.92

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

26.41

-13.65

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWEQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWEQ.DE and CBUI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWEQ.DECBUI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

3.41

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.05

-0.16

Drawdowns

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, which is greater than CBUI.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEQ.DE and CBUI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWEQ.DECBUI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.80%

-19.48%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-6.34%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.22%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-3.23%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.67%

+0.19%

Volatility

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEQ.DE) is 2.76%, while iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that XWEQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWEQ.DECBUI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

3.73%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

9.76%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

12.88%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

14.21%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

14.21%

+0.97%

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWEQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XWEQ.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWEQ.DE nor CBUI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XWEQ.DE and CBUI.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XWEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUI.DE.

XWEQ.DE tracks MSCI World Quality Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while CBUI.DE tracks MSCI World Value ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEQ.DE and 0.30% for CBUI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWEQ.DE and CBUI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer