XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

XWEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWT.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XWEM.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while XDWT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWEM.L returned 36.83% vs 44.62% for XDWT.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWEM.L achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly higher than XDWT.L's 20.60% return.

XWEM.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 22.01%
• 6M: 24.55%
• 1Y: 36.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDWT.L

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 23.72%
• 1Y: 44.62%
• 3Y*: 29.97%
• 5Y*: 19.94%
• 10Y*: 24.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XWEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C	22.01%	21.57%	28.83%	9.50%
XDWT.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C	20.60%	22.42%	33.89%	11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XWEM.L and XDWT.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023	0.83

The correlation between XWEM.L and XDWT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWEM.L

XWEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
XWEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XWEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XWEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XWEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

XDWT.L

XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XWEM.L	XDWT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.08	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.81	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.35	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	2.63	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.39	7.63	+5.76

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWEM.L and XDWT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWEM.L drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, smaller than the maximum XDWT.L drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEM.L and XDWT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XWEM.L	XDWT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.12%	-35.99%	+16.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-16.86%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.99%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-5.41%	+5.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-5.61%	+3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	5.83%	-3.09%

Volatility

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) is 6.17%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that XWEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XWEM.L	XDWT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.17%	8.94%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.16%	16.99%	-1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	21.37%	-3.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	23.71%	-6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	21.97%	-4.58%

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XWEM.L and XDWT.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XWEM.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWEM.L nor XDWT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XWEM.L and XDWT.L in my portfolio?

XWEM.L and XDWT.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XWEM.L or XDWT.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XWEM.L or XDWT.L?

XWEM.L and XDWT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between XWEM.L and XDWT.L?

XWEM.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. XWEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.