XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L
XWEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and IWFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - XWEM.L tracks the MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select while IWFV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XWEM.L returned 36.83% vs 64.00% for IWFV.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XWEM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IWFV.L.
Performance
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XWEM.L is traded in USD, while IWFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWEM.L achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly lower than IWFV.L's 34.44% return.
XWEM.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 22.01%
- 6M
- 24.55%
- 1Y
- 36.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWFV.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 34.44%
- 6M
- 36.64%
- 1Y
- 64.00%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XWEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 22.01% | 21.57% | 28.83% | 9.50% |
IWFV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF | 34.44% | 40.55% | 5.07% | 7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWEM.L and IWFV.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XWEM.L and IWFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWEM.L
IWFV.L
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XWEM.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.72 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 7.35 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 27.35 | -13.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWEM.L drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, smaller than the maximum IWFV.L drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWEM.L and IWFV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWEM.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.12% | -48.50% | +29.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -8.67% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.66% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -19.94% | +17.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.33% | +0.41% |
Volatility
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XWEM.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) have volatilities of 6.17% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWEM.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 5.95% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 12.95% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 15.53% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 20.76% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 19.36% | -1.97% |
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWEM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XWEM.L vs. IWFV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWEM.L nor IWFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XWEM.L and IWFV.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XWEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFV.L.
XWEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Low Carbon SRI Screened Select, while IWFV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWEM.L and 0.30% for IWFV.L.
Find the right allocation for XWEM.L and IWFV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer