XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L
XWD1.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XWD1.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. XWD1.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.L.
Performance
XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XWD1.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 35.90%
- 3Y*
- 27.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.56%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWD1.L
XNAS.L
XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWD1.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.65 | — |
Drawdowns
XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWD1.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.17% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.38% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility
XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWD1.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.01% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.69% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.24% | — |
XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWD1.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWD1.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWD1.L nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XWD1.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWD1.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.L.
XWD1.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XNAS.L is Nasdaq-100. XWD1.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWD1.L and 0.20% for XNAS.L.
Find the right allocation for XWD1.L and XNAS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer