XWD1.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XWD1.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both Global Equities funds - XWD1.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while PACW.L tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. XWD1.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

XWD1.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XWD1.L is traded in USD, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

XWD1.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PACW.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XWD1.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Volatility

XWD1.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWD1.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XWD1.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWD1.L nor PACW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XWD1.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XWD1.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XWD1.L.

What is the main difference between XWD1.L and PACW.L?

XWD1.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWD1.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.