XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
XNAS.L and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both XNAS.L and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -8.15% | 19.83% | 26.60% | 56.41% | -1.82% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -8.17% | 19.75% | 26.45% | 56.31% | -1.80% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XNAS.L having a -8.15% return and CNDX.L slightly lower at -8.17%.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- -8.15%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNDX.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -8.17%
- 6M
- -4.93%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 18.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
CNDX.L
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.72 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.27 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 8.55 | -1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 1.02 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and CNDX.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.L nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and CNDX.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -35.17% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -12.06% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.47% | -10.52% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -5.35% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.92% | +0.09% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) have volatilities of 4.93% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.07% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 11.48% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 19.47% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 20.82% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 19.98% | -0.63% |