XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L
XWD1.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XWD1.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. XWD1.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XWD1.L is traded in USD, while XCX5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XCX5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XWD1.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCX5.L
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- -13.93%
- 6M
- -13.92%
- 1Y
- -14.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWD1.L
XCX5.L
XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWD1.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.02 | — |
Drawdowns
XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWD1.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -45.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -23.49% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.22% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.07% | — |
Volatility
XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWD1.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.63% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.03% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.82% | — |
XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWD1.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XWD1.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWD1.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XWD1.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XWD1.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XWD1.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XWD1.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWD1.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XWD1.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer