PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XWD1.L vs. VALW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.L) and SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XWD1.L is traded in USD, while VALW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VALW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XWD1.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VALW.L

1D
-2.20%
1M
3.67%
YTD
16.16%
6M
18.74%
1Y
41.25%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWD1.L

VALW.L
VALW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VALW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VALW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XWD1.L) and SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XWD1.LVALW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

Drawdowns

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XWD1.LVALW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

Volatility

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XWD1.LVALW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.52%

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWD1.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than VALW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XWD1.L vs. VALW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XWD1.L nor VALW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XWD1.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XWD1.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VALW.L.

XWD1.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VALW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XWD1.L and 0.25% for VALW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XWD1.L and VALW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer