PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALW.L vs. FUQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VALW.L is traded in GBP, while FUQIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FUQIX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALW.L achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly higher than FUQIX's 6.29% return.


VALW.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
9.99%
YTD
19.01%
6M
21.67%
1Y
46.02%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*

FUQIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
6.63%
YTD
6.29%
6M
5.65%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
16.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
19.01%27.01%5.92%16.43%0.09%20.68%-18.17%
FUQIX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
6.29%8.44%26.50%23.15%-8.35%29.50%-2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VALW.L and FUQIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.36

The correlation between VALW.L and FUQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALW.L vs. FUQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALW.L
VALW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VALW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VALW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FUQIX
FUQIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FUQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALW.LFUQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.31

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.51

1.82

+4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.41

6.40

+18.02

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the FUQIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALW.L and FUQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALW.LFUQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

1.74

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.94

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.92

-0.25

Drawdowns

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, which is greater than FUQIX's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALW.L and FUQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALW.LFUQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.59%

-22.95%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-11.77%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-19.59%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

-19.59%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.28%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-3.35%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

3.33%

-1.45%

Volatility

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund (FUQIX) at 2.36%. This indicates that VALW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALW.LFUQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

2.36%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

8.95%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

12.26%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

16.25%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

18.48%

-1.80%

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FUQIX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VALW.L vs. FUQIX - Dividend Comparison

VALW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUQIX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Quality Index Fund
3.42%3.63%12.80%2.38%1.42%8.55%9.46%13.68%2.41%3.79%1.57%0.29%
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VALW.L and FUQIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALW.L and FUQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer