PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XVLU.TO (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF) and CUD.TO (iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from iShares - XVLU.TO tracks the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index while CUD.TO tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XVLU.TO returned 19.03%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for CUD.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XVLU.TO charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for CUD.TO.

Performance

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF (XVLU.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVLU.TO achieves a 50.62% return, which is significantly higher than CUD.TO's 5.32% return.

XVLU.TO

1D
0.06%
1M
23.30%
YTD
50.62%
6M
51.55%
1Y
95.75%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
—

CUD.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
5.32%
6M
1.10%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
5.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XVLU.TO
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF		50.62%26.17%15.37%11.09%-8.87%28.64%-3.66%7.29%
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		5.32%1.72%6.13%0.09%-2.31%18.87%-2.58%6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XVLU.TO and CUD.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019

0.49

The correlation between XVLU.TO and CUD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XVLU.TO
CUD.TO

Technology

44.5%
10.5%

Financial Services

10.4%
12.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.8%

Communication Services

8.3%
2.5%

Industrials

7.3%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
16.2%

Energy

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

1.9%
14.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
4.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
6.0%

Technology

XVLU.TO
44.5%
CUD.TO
10.5%

Financial Services

XVLU.TO
10.4%
CUD.TO
12.0%

Healthcare

XVLU.TO
8.5%
CUD.TO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XVLU.TO
8.4%
CUD.TO
5.8%

Communication Services

XVLU.TO
8.3%
CUD.TO
2.5%

Industrials

XVLU.TO
7.3%
CUD.TO
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

XVLU.TO
4.0%
CUD.TO
16.2%

Energy

XVLU.TO
3.2%
CUD.TO
3.2%

Utilities

XVLU.TO
1.9%
CUD.TO
14.6%

Real Estate

XVLU.TO
1.8%
CUD.TO
4.4%

Basic Materials

XVLU.TO
1.6%
CUD.TO
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF

iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XVLU.TO:
XVLU.TO vs. VLUEXVLU.TO vs. VFV.TOXVLU.TO vs. XQLT.TOXVLU.TO vs. XSMC.TOXVLU.TO vs. FCUV.TOXVLU.TO vs. XDU.TOXVLU.TO vs. XDG.TO
Often compared with CUD.TO:
CUD.TO vs. CDZ.TOCUD.TO vs. XHU.TOCUD.TO vs. DGROCUD.TO vs. CYH.TOCUD.TO vs. SCHDCUD.TO vs. ^GSPCCUD.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XVLU.TO
XVLU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XVLU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
CUD.TO
CUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF (XVLU.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XVLU.TOCUD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.59
0.40

+5.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
7.16
0.64

+6.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.08

+0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.34

0.64

+12.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.16

1.57

+53.59

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVLU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.59, which is higher than the CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVLU.TO and CUD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XVLU.TOCUD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59

0.40

+5.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.12

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.35

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.60

+0.34

Drawdowns

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVLU.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum CUD.TO drawdown of -38.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVLU.TO and CUD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XVLU.TOCUD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.40%

-38.36%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-7.34%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

-15.28%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

-18.06%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-38.36%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.84%

+4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-4.09%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

3.00%

-1.26%

Volatility

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF (XVLU.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) at 2.69%. This indicates that XVLU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XVLU.TOCUD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.55%

2.69%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

8.82%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

11.74%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

14.67%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

17.20%

+1.62%

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVLU.TO has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CUD.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

XVLU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XVLU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than CUD.TO's 1.92% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.92%1.99%1.76%1.96%1.84%1.98%2.05%1.65%2.05%1.44%1.76%1.72%
XVLU.TO
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF		1.12%1.75%2.17%2.26%2.51%2.03%2.72%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XVLU.TO and CUD.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XVLU.TO is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XVLU.TO is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CUD.TO.

XVLU.TO tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while CUD.TO tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XVLU.TO and 0.66% for CUD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XVLU.TO and CUD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer