PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.L achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than XUT3.L's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XUTD.L has underperformed XUT3.L with an annualized return of 0.90%, while XUT3.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.74% annualized return.


XUTD.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.03%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
0.90%

XUT3.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.93%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
-0.22%6.38%0.77%3.91%-12.78%-2.45%7.94%7.21%0.66%2.22%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
0.54%5.06%4.13%4.10%-3.60%-0.62%2.95%3.56%1.44%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.L and XUT3.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.69

The correlation between XUTD.L and XUT3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.L
XUTD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.LXUT3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.67

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

5.10

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

20.02

-16.30

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.L and XUT3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.LXUT3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

3.06

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.98

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

1.16

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.14

-0.71

Drawdowns

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than XUT3.L's maximum drawdown of -5.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.L and XUT3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.LXUT3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-5.45%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-0.67%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-0.91%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-5.45%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

-5.45%

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.12%

-7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-0.72%

-4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.17%

+0.82%

Volatility

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) at 0.41%. This indicates that XUTD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUT3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.LXUT3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

0.41%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

0.80%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

1.13%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

1.90%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

1.50%

+3.55%

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUTD.L and XUT3.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.L vs. XUT3.L - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than XUT3.L's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.84%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%0.00%
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.48%3.27%3.65%2.39%1.95%3.42%1.08%1.47%1.35%1.34%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUTD.L and XUT3.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUTD.L and XUT3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

XUTD.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.L and XUT3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer