PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UB82.L vs. TRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UB82.L is traded in GBp, while TRES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRES.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with UB82.L at -0.11% and TRES.L at -0.11%.


UB82.L

1D
0.14%
1M
1.11%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-1.72%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
-0.32%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*

TRES.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.90%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
0.26%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.11%0.56%0.48%-3.11%-6.16%-0.72%4.31%9.61%
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.11%-0.73%2.21%-1.37%-1.93%-1.56%2.60%6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between UB82.L and TRES.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.38

Over the past year, UB82.L and TRES.L have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UB82.L vs. TRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB82.L
UB82.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UB82.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB82.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB82.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UB82.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB82.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

TRES.L
TRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UB82.LTRES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.79

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

1.98

+0.39

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB82.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the TRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB82.L and TRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UB82.LTRES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.69

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.07

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.09

+0.04

Drawdowns

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB82.L drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, roughly equal to the maximum TRES.L drawdown of -23.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB82.L and TRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UB82.LTRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.85%

-23.25%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-5.79%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.79%

-8.72%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.39%

-16.71%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.32%

-18.30%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-15.87%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.30%

-0.15%

Volatility

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) is 1.50%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) has a volatility of 1.81%. This indicates that UB82.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UB82.LTRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.81%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.44%

5.16%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.57%

6.64%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.54%

9.19%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

9.92%

+6.08%

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB82.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TRES.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UB82.L vs. TRES.L - Dividend Comparison

UB82.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than TRES.L's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.26%4.19%4.26%3.78%1.96%1.14%1.58%1.96%0.00%
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.10%2.20%2.52%2.82%1.33%0.99%1.81%1.93%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


UB82.L and TRES.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB82.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB82.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRES.L.

UB82.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while TRES.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for UB82.L and 0.06% for TRES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB82.L and TRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer