PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUTD.L is traded in USD, while TSY3.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TSY3.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.L achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than TSY3.L's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XUTD.L has underperformed TSY3.L with an annualized return of 0.90%, while TSY3.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.70% annualized return.


XUTD.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.03%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
0.90%

TSY3.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.47%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
-0.22%6.38%0.77%3.91%-12.78%-2.45%7.94%7.21%0.66%2.22%
TSY3.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.47%5.39%4.03%3.54%-3.91%-0.41%2.59%4.24%1.20%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.L and TSY3.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2013

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.L
XUTD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

TSY3.L
TSY3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TSY3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.LTSY3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.12

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

9.53

-5.82

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the TSY3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.L and TSY3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.LTSY3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.82

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.35

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.33

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.30

+0.13

Drawdowns

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than TSY3.L's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.L and TSY3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.LTSY3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-7.43%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-1.10%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-1.74%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-7.00%

-10.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

-7.43%

-12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.36%

-7.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-1.54%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.36%

+0.63%

Volatility

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.LTSY3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.41%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

3.40%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

4.18%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

5.15%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

5.15%

-0.10%

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTD.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TSY3.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.L vs. TSY3.L - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than TSY3.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSY3.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.92%4.25%4.07%3.02%0.60%0.56%1.84%2.14%1.31%1.04%0.63%0.52%
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.48%3.27%3.65%2.39%1.95%3.42%1.08%1.47%1.35%1.34%2.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUTD.L and TSY3.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSY3.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSY3.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for XUTD.L.

XUTD.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while TSY3.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.L and 0.05% for TSY3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.L and TSY3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer