PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUTD.L is traded in USD, while TRIS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TRIS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.L achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than TRIS.L's 1.35% return.


XUTD.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.03%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
0.90%

TRIS.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.89%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
-0.22%6.38%0.77%3.91%-12.78%-2.45%6.52%
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
1.35%4.55%5.06%4.48%0.53%0.33%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.L and TRIS.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2020

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.L
XUTD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIS.L
TRIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.LTRIS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

4.43

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

13.13

-9.41

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.L and TRIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.LTRIS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.91

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.68

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.55

-0.12

Drawdowns

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than TRIS.L's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.L and TRIS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.LTRIS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-2.50%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-0.88%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-1.07%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-2.43%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.16%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-0.53%

-5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.30%

+0.69%

Volatility

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) is 1.40%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that XUTD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.LTRIS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.59%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

3.54%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

4.27%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

4.80%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

4.93%

+0.12%

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUTD.L and TRIS.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.L vs. TRIS.L - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than TRIS.L's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.01%4.26%4.87%4.68%1.52%0.10%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.48%3.27%3.65%2.39%1.95%3.42%1.08%1.47%1.35%1.34%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUTD.L and TRIS.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUTD.L and TRIS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

XUTD.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while TRIS.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.L and TRIS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer