PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUTD.L is traded in USD, while BBLL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BBLL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.L achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than BBLL.L's 1.39% return.


XUTD.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.03%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
0.90%

BBLL.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.L and BBLL.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.L
XUTD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.L
BBLL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.LBBLL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

4.46

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

13.72

-10.00

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.L and BBLL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.LBBLL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.95

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.85

-0.42

Drawdowns

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than BBLL.L's maximum drawdown of -0.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.L and BBLL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.LBBLL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-0.88%

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-0.88%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.17%

-7.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-0.23%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.29%

+0.70%

Volatility

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.LBBLL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.41%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

3.50%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

4.15%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

4.21%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

4.21%

+0.84%

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTD.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BBLL.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.L vs. BBLL.L - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, while BBLL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBLL.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.48%3.27%3.65%2.39%1.95%3.42%1.08%1.47%1.35%1.34%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUTD.L and BBLL.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUTD.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUTD.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBLL.L.

XUTD.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while BBLL.L tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.L and 0.07% for BBLL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.L and BBLL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer