PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XUTD.DE having a 1.08% return and PR1S.DE slightly lower at 1.04%.


XUTD.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.08%
6M
0.34%
1Y
1.80%
3Y*
0.11%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
0.68%

PR1S.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.32%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
0.10%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUTD.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
1.08%-5.37%6.37%0.41%-7.33%5.70%-1.66%8.74%
PR1S.DE
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.04%-5.53%6.59%0.45%-6.79%5.94%-1.86%-4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.DE and PR1S.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.90

The correlation between XUTD.DE and PR1S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.DE
XUTD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XUTD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1S.DE
PR1S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PR1S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.DEPR1S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.05

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.40

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

1.01

+0.11

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the PR1S.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.DE and PR1S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.30

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.07

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.09

+0.14

Drawdowns

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.01%, which is greater than PR1S.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.DE and PR1S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.01%

-17.15%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-4.05%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.06%

-11.04%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.06%

-12.84%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.39%

-12.54%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-10.33%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.62%

-0.02%

Volatility

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE) at 0.86%. This indicates that XUTD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.86%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

3.80%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

5.49%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

8.02%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

8.93%

-0.99%

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTD.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1S.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than PR1S.DE's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PR1S.DE
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
3.19%3.22%2.83%2.36%1.91%1.73%2.14%1.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUTD.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.47%3.43%3.53%2.45%1.97%3.26%1.18%1.46%1.26%1.51%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XUTD.DE and PR1S.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1S.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1S.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for XUTD.DE.

XUTD.DE tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while PR1S.DE tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.DE and 0.05% for PR1S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.DE and PR1S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer