XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE
XUTD.DE (Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D) and MDBA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both Government Bonds funds - XUTD.DE tracks the iBoxx USD Treasuries Index while MDBA.DE tracks the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUTD.DE returned 0.47%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for MDBA.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XUTD.DE charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MDBA.DE.
Performance
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUTD.DE achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than MDBA.DE's 1.20% return.
XUTD.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUTD.DE Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D | 1.08% | -5.37% | 6.37% | 0.41% | -7.33% | 5.70% | -1.66% | 9.76% | 1.24% |
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.20% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 6.67% | -4.47% | 7.64% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUTD.DE and MDBA.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between XUTD.DE and MDBA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XUTD.DE
MDBA.DE
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUTD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 0.43 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 1.04 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUTD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.26 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.24 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUTD.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.01%, which is greater than MDBA.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.DE and MDBA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUTD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -12.17% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.92% | -3.81% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.06% | -10.11% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.06% | -12.02% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -6.13% | -7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -5.56% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.55% | +0.05% |
Volatility
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) at 0.85%. This indicates that XUTD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUTD.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 0.85% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 3.65% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 5.31% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 7.26% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 7.03% | +0.91% |
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUTD.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUTD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Dividend Comparison
XUTD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while MDBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUTD.DE Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D | 3.47% | 3.43% | 3.53% | 2.45% | 1.97% | 3.26% | 1.18% | 1.46% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XUTD.DE and MDBA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XUTD.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUTD.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDBA.DE.
XUTD.DE tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.DE and 0.15% for MDBA.DE.
Find the right allocation for XUTD.DE and MDBA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer