PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XSEM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XUSR.TO having a 19.89% return and XSEM.TO slightly higher at 20.20%.


XUSR.TO

1D
-1.31%
1M
-1.86%
6M
16.85%
YTD
19.89%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
23.86%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*

XSEM.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
-5.34%
6M
15.56%
YTD
20.20%
1Y
33.75%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF
19.89%9.23%32.46%29.28%-17.20%24.47%27.03%
XSEM.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF
20.20%27.51%14.79%7.01%-17.30%-3.60%30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSR.TO and XSEM.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020

0.47

The correlation between XUSR.TO and XSEM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUSR.TO
XSEM.TO

Technology

54.1%
44.1%

Financial Services

15.3%
22.1%

Industrials

7.9%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.6%

Healthcare

5.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

3.8%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.8%

Communication Services

1.7%
7.4%

Utilities

1.3%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.0%

Energy

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

XUSR.TO
54.1%
XSEM.TO
44.1%

Financial Services

XUSR.TO
15.3%
XSEM.TO
22.1%

Industrials

XUSR.TO
7.9%
XSEM.TO
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XUSR.TO
6.6%
XSEM.TO
7.6%

Healthcare

XUSR.TO
5.8%
XSEM.TO
2.5%

Real Estate

XUSR.TO
3.8%
XSEM.TO
1.0%

Basic Materials

XUSR.TO
2.4%
XSEM.TO
4.8%

Communication Services

XUSR.TO
1.7%
XSEM.TO
7.4%

Utilities

XUSR.TO
1.3%
XSEM.TO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

XUSR.TO
1.0%
XSEM.TO
2.0%

Energy

XUSR.TO
0.1%
XSEM.TO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSR.TO
XUSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XSEM.TO
XSEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XSEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XSEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUSR.TOXSEM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.76

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

8.82

-2.53

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the XSEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSR.TO and XSEM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.17%, smaller than the maximum XSEM.TO drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSR.TO and XSEM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSR.TOXSEM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.17%

-37.09%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-12.30%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.01%

-15.18%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

-32.59%

+1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-8.26%

+4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-13.08%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.84%

+0.09%

Volatility

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) is 6.80%, while iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XSEM.TO) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that XUSR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSR.TOXSEM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

10.44%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

21.44%

-6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.41%

23.39%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

18.04%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.87%

18.81%

+5.06%

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSR.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than XSEM.TO's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUSR.TO vs. XSEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than XSEM.TO's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XSEM.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF
1.56%1.78%2.08%1.10%2.25%2.45%1.14%2.41%
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF
0.58%0.67%0.69%0.93%1.01%0.66%0.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSR.TO and XSEM.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUSR.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XSEM.TO.

XUSR.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XSEM.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. XUSR.TO tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while XSEM.TO tracks Morningstar EM GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for XUSR.TO and 0.32% for XSEM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSR.TO and XSEM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer