PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSR.TO vs. EAOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUSR.TO is traded in CAD, while EAOR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EAOR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSR.TO achieves a 21.47% return, which is significantly higher than EAOR's 10.05% return.


XUSR.TO

1D
-2.21%
1M
4.87%
YTD
21.47%
6M
18.00%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
26.31%
5Y*
15.87%
10Y*

EAOR

1D
-1.24%
1M
3.09%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.19%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF
21.47%9.23%32.46%29.28%-17.20%24.47%15.06%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
10.05%10.31%20.06%12.22%-11.38%10.45%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSR.TO and EAOR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020

0.55

The correlation between XUSR.TO and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSR.TO
XUSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUSR.TOEAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.76

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

13.47

-5.00

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSR.TO and EAOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.17%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -18.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSR.TO and EAOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSR.TOEAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.17%

-18.16%

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-5.58%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.01%

-11.59%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

-18.16%

-13.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-1.24%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-3.97%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

1.56%

+2.32%

Volatility

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 4.10%. This indicates that XUSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSR.TOEAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

4.10%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

8.23%

+6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

9.95%

+7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

12.21%

+8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

12.20%

+11.69%

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSR.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUSR.TO vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

XUSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than EAOR's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.36%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF
0.56%0.67%0.69%0.93%1.01%0.66%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSR.TO and EAOR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for XUSR.TO.

XUSR.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EAOR is Diversified Portfolio. XUSR.TO tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for XUSR.TO and 0.18% for EAOR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSR.TO and EAOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer