PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSR.TO achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 16.01% return.


XUSR.TO

1D
-0.71%
1M
11.78%
YTD
21.07%
6M
17.73%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
26.02%
5Y*
16.66%
10Y*

QQCI.TO

1D
0.35%
1M
9.28%
YTD
16.01%
6M
14.16%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF
21.07%9.24%5.92%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
16.01%12.64%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSR.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024

0.72

The correlation between XUSR.TO and QQCI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUSR.TO
QQCI.TO

Technology

56.7%
53.8%

Financial Services

14.3%
0.2%

Industrials

7.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
12.3%

Healthcare

4.6%
4.2%

Real Estate

3.7%
0.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
15.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
7.7%

Energy

0.1%
0.6%

Technology

XUSR.TO
56.7%
QQCI.TO
53.8%

Financial Services

XUSR.TO
14.3%
QQCI.TO
0.2%

Industrials

XUSR.TO
7.7%
QQCI.TO
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XUSR.TO
6.3%
QQCI.TO
12.3%

Healthcare

XUSR.TO
4.6%
QQCI.TO
4.2%

Real Estate

XUSR.TO
3.7%
QQCI.TO
0.1%

Communication Services

XUSR.TO
2.2%
QQCI.TO
15.8%

Basic Materials

XUSR.TO
2.2%
QQCI.TO
1.1%

Utilities

XUSR.TO
1.2%
QQCI.TO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

XUSR.TO
0.9%
QQCI.TO
7.7%

Energy

XUSR.TO
0.1%
QQCI.TO
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSR.TO
XUSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSR.TOQQCI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

4.61

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

16.33

-7.72

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSR.TO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSR.TOQQCI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.71

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.52

-0.41

Drawdowns

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSR.TO and QQCI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSR.TOQQCI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-18.95%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-7.62%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-3.10%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.14%

+1.69%

Volatility

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 3.32%. This indicates that XUSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSR.TOQQCI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

3.32%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

9.39%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

12.98%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

15.55%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

15.55%

+2.04%

Dividends

XUSR.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than QQCI.TO's 8.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
8.60%9.34%3.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF
0.56%0.67%0.68%0.93%1.01%0.65%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSR.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XUSR.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. XUSR.TO tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while QQCI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSR.TO and QQCI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer