PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XUSR.TO (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF) and QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - XUSR.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while QQC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUSR.TO returned 16.66%/yr vs 21.56%/yr for QQC.TO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XUSR.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQC.TO.

Performance

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSR.TO achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 22.65% return.

XUSR.TO

1D
-0.71%
1M
11.78%
YTD
21.07%
6M
17.73%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
26.02%
5Y*
16.66%
10Y*
—

QQC.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
12.93%
YTD
22.65%
6M
19.07%
1Y
43.34%
3Y*
29.99%
5Y*
21.56%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF		21.07%9.24%32.45%29.28%-17.20%15.69%
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged		22.65%15.38%35.73%51.73%-28.07%25.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSR.TO and QQC.TO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021

0.84

The correlation between XUSR.TO and QQC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUSR.TO
QQC.TO

Technology

56.7%
53.8%

Financial Services

14.3%
0.2%

Industrials

7.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
12.3%

Healthcare

4.6%
4.2%

Real Estate

3.7%
0.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
15.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
7.7%

Energy

0.1%
0.6%

Technology

XUSR.TO
56.7%
QQC.TO
53.8%

Financial Services

XUSR.TO
14.3%
QQC.TO
0.2%

Industrials

XUSR.TO
7.7%
QQC.TO
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XUSR.TO
6.3%
QQC.TO
12.3%

Healthcare

XUSR.TO
4.6%
QQC.TO
4.2%

Real Estate

XUSR.TO
3.7%
QQC.TO
0.1%

Communication Services

XUSR.TO
2.2%
QQC.TO
15.8%

Basic Materials

XUSR.TO
2.2%
QQC.TO
1.1%

Utilities

XUSR.TO
1.2%
QQC.TO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

XUSR.TO
0.9%
QQC.TO
7.7%

Energy

XUSR.TO
0.1%
QQC.TO
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged

Often compared with XUSR.TO:
XUSR.TO vs. XSUS.TOXUSR.TO vs. XUS.TOXUSR.TO vs. XCSR.TOXUSR.TO vs. VFV.TOXUSR.TO vs. USXFXUSR.TO vs. EAORXUSR.TO vs. VDY.TO
Often compared with QQC.TO:
QQC.TO vs. VFV.TOQQC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQC.TO vs. QQQQQC.TO vs. TEC.TOQQC.TO vs. HXQ.TOQQC.TO vs. QQC-F.TOQQC.TO vs. QQQM

Return for Risk

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUSR.TO
XUSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
QQC.TO
QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XUSR.TOQQC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.08
2.84

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.75
3.69

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.59

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

11.38

-2.77

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSR.TO and QQC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XUSR.TOQQC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.84

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

1.04

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.02

+0.09

Drawdowns

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSR.TO and QQC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUSR.TOQQC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-31.81%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-12.14%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.02%

-22.59%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

-31.81%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-8.06%

+1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

3.82%

+0.01%

Volatility

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) at 4.36%. This indicates that XUSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUSR.TOQQC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

4.36%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

11.58%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

15.33%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

20.85%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

20.82%

-3.23%

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSR.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUSR.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than QQC.TO's 0.31% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged		0.31%0.39%0.45%0.54%0.91%0.56%0.00%
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF		0.56%0.67%0.68%0.93%1.01%0.65%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUSR.TO and QQC.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQC.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQC.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for XUSR.TO.

XUSR.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQC.TO is Nasdaq-100. XUSR.TO tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while QQC.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for XUSR.TO and 0.20% for QQC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSR.TO and QQC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer