PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XUSR.TO (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF) and CSKR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XUSR.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while CSKR.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUSR.TO returned 16.66%/yr vs 23.07%/yr for CSKR.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUSR.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSKR.L.

Performance

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUSR.TO is traded in CAD, while CSKR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSKR.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSR.TO achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly lower than CSKR.L's 119.54% return.

XUSR.TO

1D
-0.71%
1M
11.78%
YTD
21.07%
6M
17.73%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
26.02%
5Y*
16.66%
10Y*
—

CSKR.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
32.92%
YTD
119.54%
6M
136.57%
1Y
262.77%
3Y*
53.42%
5Y*
23.07%
10Y*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF		21.07%9.24%32.45%29.28%-17.20%24.47%27.06%
CSKR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)		119.54%90.30%-16.02%17.11%-23.43%-9.07%57.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSR.TO and CSKR.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.25

The correlation between XUSR.TO and CSKR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUSR.TO
CSKR.L

Technology

56.7%
58.7%

Financial Services

14.3%
8.8%

Industrials

7.7%
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
6.4%

Healthcare

4.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

3.7%

-

Communication Services

2.2%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.7%

Utilities

1.2%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
1.2%

Energy

0.1%
0.9%

Technology

XUSR.TO
56.7%
CSKR.L
58.7%

Financial Services

XUSR.TO
14.3%
CSKR.L
8.8%

Industrials

XUSR.TO
7.7%
CSKR.L
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XUSR.TO
6.3%
CSKR.L
6.4%

Healthcare

XUSR.TO
4.6%
CSKR.L
2.7%

Real Estate

XUSR.TO
3.7%
CSKR.L

-

Communication Services

XUSR.TO
2.2%
CSKR.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

XUSR.TO
2.2%
CSKR.L
1.7%

Utilities

XUSR.TO
1.2%
CSKR.L
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

XUSR.TO
0.9%
CSKR.L
1.2%

Energy

XUSR.TO
0.1%
CSKR.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with XUSR.TO:
XUSR.TO vs. XSUS.TOXUSR.TO vs. XUS.TOXUSR.TO vs. XCSR.TOXUSR.TO vs. VFV.TOXUSR.TO vs. USXFXUSR.TO vs. EAORXUSR.TO vs. VDY.TO
Often compared with CSKR.L:
CSKR.L vs. TDGB.LCSKR.L vs. EWYCSKR.L vs. BNDCSKR.L vs. IUCD.LCSKR.L vs. FBTU.LCSKR.L vs. AINF.LCSKR.L vs. IEVL.L

Return for Risk

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUSR.TO
XUSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
CSKR.L
CSKR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSKR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XUSR.TOCSKR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.08
6.77

-4.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.75
5.97

-3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.88

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

12.00

-9.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

42.63

-34.02

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the CSKR.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSR.TO and CSKR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XUSR.TOCSKR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

6.77

-4.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.86

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.83

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.71

+0.40

Drawdowns

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum CSKR.L drawdown of -47.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSR.TO and CSKR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUSR.TOCSKR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-47.13%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-21.75%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.02%

-26.91%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

-43.42%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-47.13%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.76%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-17.97%

+11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

6.13%

-2.30%

Volatility

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF (XUSR.TO) is 4.94%, while iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) has a volatility of 18.19%. This indicates that XUSR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSKR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUSR.TOCSKR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

18.19%

-13.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

33.50%

-20.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

38.57%

-22.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

27.70%

-9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

27.62%

-10.03%

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSR.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than CSKR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XUSR.TO vs. CSKR.L - Dividend Comparison

XUSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while CSKR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CSKR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUSR.TO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA Index ETF		0.56%0.67%0.68%0.93%1.01%0.65%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUSR.TO and CSKR.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUSR.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUSR.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSKR.L.

XUSR.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CSKR.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XUSR.TO tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while CSKR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for XUSR.TO and 0.65% for CSKR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSR.TO and CSKR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer