PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUS.TO vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUS.TO vs. WMT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XUS.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XUS.TO returned 17.59%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for WMT. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XUS.TO vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUS.TO is traded in CAD, while WMT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WMT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XUS.TO having a 11.06% return and WMT slightly higher at 11.29%. Over the past 10 years, XUS.TO has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 17.59%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.80% annualized return.

XUS.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
2.06%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.01%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
23.38%
5Y*
17.34%
10Y*
17.59%

WMT

1D
0.63%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
11.29%
6M
5.62%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
36.19%
5Y*
26.01%
10Y*
20.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUS.TO vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUS.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF		11.06%12.19%35.81%24.87%-11.33%28.81%17.22%27.24%5.11%15.32%
WMT
Walmart Inc.		11.29%18.81%88.72%10.20%5.84%1.92%20.40%24.80%4.69%36.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XUS.TO and WMT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2013

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between XUS.TO and WMT has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF

Walmart Inc.

Often compared with XUS.TO:
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TOXUS.TO vs. XEQT.TOXUS.TO vs. XUU.TOXUS.TO vs. ZSP.TOXUS.TO vs. VOOXUS.TO vs. XEF.TOXUS.TO vs. HXS.TO
Often compared with WMT:
WMT vs. COSTWMT vs. TGTWMT vs. VOOWMT vs. KRWMT vs. XLPWMT vs. SCHDWMT vs. ABBV

Return for Risk

XUS.TO vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUS.TO
XUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUS.TO vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XUS.TOWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.32
1.30

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.11
1.92

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.10

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

6.85

+5.21

XUS.TO vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUS.TO and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUS.TO vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.24%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -47.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUS.TO and WMT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUS.TOWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.24%

-47.96%

+20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-15.14%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.96%

-22.27%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-24.22%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.24%

-24.22%

-3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-8.27%

+6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-13.52%

+10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

4.63%

-2.33%

Volatility

XUS.TO vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) is 4.54%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that XUS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUS.TOWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

10.08%

-5.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

19.04%

-9.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

24.44%

-12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

22.53%

-7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

22.81%

-6.27%

Dividends

XUS.TO vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

XUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WMT
Walmart Inc.		0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%
XUS.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF		1.13%1.26%1.45%2.43%2.76%1.99%2.70%4.05%3.55%2.96%3.32%3.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUS.TO and WMT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUS.TO and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer