XUS.TO vs. XSP.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO).
XUS.TO and XSP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XUS.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2013. XSP.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both XUS.TO and XSP.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XUS.TO or XSP.TO.
Key characteristics
| XUS.TO | XSP.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.96% | 18.08% |
| 1Y Return | 29.54% | 26.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.96% | 8.45% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.49% | 13.63% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.96% | 11.46% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.61 | 2.09 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.04% | 12.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.23% | -57.82% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.03% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUS.TO and XSP.TO is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XUS.TO achieves a 21.96% return, which is significantly higher than XSP.TO's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XUS.TO has outperformed XSP.TO with an annualized return of 14.96%, while XSP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.46% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XUS.TO and XSP.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TO - Dividend Comparison
XUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than XSP.TO's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUS.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.38% | 0.99% | 1.35% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.48% | 1.66% | 1.70% | 1.36% | 1.07% |
XSP.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.37% | 1.00% | 1.31% | 1.73% | 1.84% | 1.47% | 1.75% | 1.86% | 1.54% | 1.46% |
Drawdowns
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum XSP.TO drawdown of -57.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUS.TO and XSP.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XUS.TO vs. XSP.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.TO) is 3.95%, while iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that XUS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.