PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUHY.DE vs. LQDH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUHY.DE is traded in EUR, while LQDH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LQDH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUHY.DE achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 4.20% return.


XUHY.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
1.22%
YTD
2.88%
6M
2.54%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

LQDH

1D
0.68%
1M
2.76%
YTD
4.20%
6M
3.76%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
4.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUHY.DE
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
2.88%-2.73%12.71%9.45%-6.31%12.25%-3.27%18.69%6.72%
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
4.20%-5.70%14.53%7.81%4.20%9.46%-6.70%11.98%5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XUHY.DE and LQDH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018

0.54

The correlation between XUHY.DE and LQDH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUHY.DE
XUHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XUHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDH
LQDH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LQDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDH Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUHY.DELQDHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.98

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

5.08

+0.32

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUHY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the LQDH Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUHY.DE and LQDH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUHY.DELQDHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.06

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.80

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.52

+0.03

Drawdowns

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUHY.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -23.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUHY.DE and LQDH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUHY.DELQDHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-23.50%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-3.43%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.03%

-12.59%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.03%

-12.59%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-3.27%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-4.79%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.34%

-0.23%

Volatility

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.DE) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) have volatilities of 1.13% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUHY.DELQDHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.12%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

4.35%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

6.45%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.51%

8.07%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

9.17%

+2.22%

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUHY.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUHY.DE vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison

XUHY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than LQDH's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
5.96%6.06%7.57%7.69%3.73%1.65%2.22%3.09%5.08%2.37%2.33%2.98%
XUHY.DE
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D
6.62%6.60%7.39%6.02%6.14%9.11%5.94%4.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUHY.DE and LQDH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUHY.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUHY.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.

XUHY.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while LQDH is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XUHY.DE and 0.25% for LQDH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUHY.DE and LQDH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer