XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XUFB.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D) and XLFQ.L (Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from DWS and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUFB.L returned 10.89%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for XLFQ.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XUFB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLFQ.L.

Performance

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUFB.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLFQ.L's -4.71% return.

XUFB.L

• 1D: 4.38%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 27.56%
• 3Y*: 27.41%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: —

XLFQ.L

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: -2.62%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: 15.45%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: 13.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D	-0.52%	23.40%	40.02%	5.21%	-10.18%	37.53%	-18.78%	35.43%	-8.04%
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF	-4.71%	7.07%	32.15%	6.12%	-0.39%	37.90%	-6.56%	27.16%	-5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XUFB.L and XLFQ.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018	0.84

The correlation between XUFB.L and XLFQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XUFB.L	XLFQ.L
Financial Services	100.0%	98.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUFB.L

XUFB.L Risk / Return Rank: 37
XUFB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XUFB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
XUFB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
XUFB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XUFB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

XLFQ.L

XLFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
XLFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
XLFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
XLFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XLFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
XLFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XUFB.L	XLFQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	0.33	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	0.57	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.07	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	0.36	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.08	0.84	+4.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUFB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the XLFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUFB.L and XLFQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XUFB.L	XLFQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	0.33	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.52	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.64	-0.20

Drawdowns

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUFB.L drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than XLFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUFB.L and XLFQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XUFB.L	XLFQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.84%	-35.39%	-6.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-12.81%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.91%	-19.01%	-8.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.18%	-19.01%	-15.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	-6.62%	+2.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.33%	-5.65%	-6.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.41%	5.48%	-0.07%

Volatility

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) at 4.46%. This indicates that XUFB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XUFB.L	XLFQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	4.46%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.77%	10.48%	+5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.12%	13.91%	+6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.14%	17.52%	+6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.85%	20.14%	+8.71%

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUFB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XLFQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUFB.L vs. XLFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while XLFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D	1.76%	1.71%	1.92%	2.54%	3.43%	1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XUFB.L and XLFQ.L in my portfolio?

XUFB.L and XLFQ.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XUFB.L or XLFQ.L?

On fees, XUFB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XUFB.L or XLFQ.L?

XUFB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLFQ.L.

What is the main difference between XUFB.L and XLFQ.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUFB.L and 0.14% for XLFQ.L.