PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XUFB.LXSTC.L
YTD Return36.86%33.16%
1Y Return60.58%40.61%
3Y Return (Ann)7.14%16.58%
5Y Return (Ann)8.33%24.63%
Sharpe Ratio2.781.94
Sortino Ratio3.982.58
Omega Ratio1.541.33
Calmar Ratio2.272.73
Martin Ratio17.298.18
Ulcer Index3.50%4.78%
Daily Std Dev21.79%20.06%
Max Drawdown-41.84%-25.32%
Current Drawdown-1.53%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between XUFB.L and XSTC.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XUFB.L achieves a 36.86% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's 33.16% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.87%
22.08%
XUFB.L
XSTC.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUFB.L and XSTC.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XUFB.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D
Expense ratio chart for XUFB.L: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%
Expense ratio chart for XSTC.L: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUFB.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XUFB.L, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XUFB.L, currently valued at 4.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XUFB.L, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.62
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XUFB.L, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XUFB.L, currently valued at 21.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0021.79
XSTC.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XSTC.L, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XSTC.L, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XSTC.L, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XSTC.L, currently valued at 3.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XSTC.L, currently valued at 10.80, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.80

XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUFB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUFB.L and XSTC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.26
2.29
XUFB.L
XSTC.L

Dividends

XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than XSTC.L's 0.38% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019
XUFB.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D
1.96%2.54%3.43%1.76%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.38%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Drawdowns

XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUFB.L drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUFB.L and XSTC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.21%
0
XUFB.L
XSTC.L

Volatility

XUFB.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 5.44%. This indicates that XUFB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.59%
5.44%
XUFB.L
XSTC.L