VEMT.L vs. CEMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB).
VEMT.L and CEMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VEMT.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Dec 6, 2016. CEMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. It was launched on Apr 17, 2012. Both VEMT.L and CEMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VEMT.L or CEMB.
Key characteristics
| VEMT.L | CEMB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.74% | 6.62% |
| 1Y Return | 4.29% | 13.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.25% | 0.30% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.93% | 1.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.60 | 3.11 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.94 | 4.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.64 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.60 | 1.03 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.42 | 21.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.61% | 0.60% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.46% | 4.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.64% | -20.84% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.75% | -1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEMT.L and CEMB is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VEMT.L vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VEMT.L achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than CEMB's 6.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VEMT.L vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEMT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VEMT.L vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VEMT.L vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison
VEMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than CEMB's 5.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEMT.L Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.89% | 6.94% | 6.03% | 5.26% | 5.72% | 5.69% | 5.90% | 6.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.04% | 4.77% | 4.28% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.25% | 4.76% | 4.23% | 3.93% |
Drawdowns
VEMT.L vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEMT.L drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum CEMB drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMT.L and CEMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VEMT.L vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) at 1.13%. This indicates that VEMT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.