XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE
XUEM.DE (Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XUEM.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUEM.DE returned 2.28%/yr vs 18.79%/yr for XNAS.DE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUEM.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUEM.DE achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.
XUEM.DE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 9.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 37.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUEM.DE Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D | 3.29% | 0.43% | 11.58% | 6.72% | -14.47% | 4.07% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 33.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUEM.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XUEM.DE
XNAS.DE
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUEM.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 3.77 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 11.16 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUEM.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.40 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.93 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.91 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.83%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEM.DE and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUEM.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.83% | -31.25% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -10.00% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -26.72% | +13.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.85% | -31.25% | +13.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -0.83% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.35% | -7.83% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 3.38% | -2.43% |
Volatility
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) is 1.06%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that XUEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUEM.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 4.31% | -3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 10.91% | -7.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 15.71% | -9.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 19.88% | -11.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 19.84% | -9.40% |
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUEM.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
XUEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUEM.DE Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D | 4.46% | 4.97% | 6.06% | 5.00% | 5.62% | 6.82% | 4.07% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUEM.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XUEM.DE.
XUEM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XUEM.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XUEM.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XUEM.DE and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer