PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUEM.DE
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
0.38%0.43%11.58%6.72%-14.47%4.14%-6.64%17.85%4.17%
IS3C.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
-3.16%5.32%-1.72%5.39%-20.57%-3.53%3.22%12.58%-2.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEM.DE achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than IS3C.DE's -3.16% return.


XUEM.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
0.38%
6M
3.04%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

IS3C.DE

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
-3.16%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
1.35%
5Y*
-3.10%
10Y*
-0.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3C.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEM.DE
XUEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XUEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3C.DE
IS3C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IS3C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEM.DEIS3C.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

0.18

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.30

0.30

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.04

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

0.22

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.35

0.87

+0.48

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is comparable to the IS3C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEM.DE and IS3C.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEM.DEIS3C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.18

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

-0.35

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-0.01

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between XUEM.DE and IS3C.DE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, while IS3C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XUEM.DE
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
4.65%4.97%6.06%5.00%5.62%6.82%4.07%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS3C.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.58%5.39%3.93%3.85%4.77%5.76%3.88%5.34%4.72%

Drawdowns

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.83%, smaller than the maximum IS3C.DE drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEM.DE and IS3C.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEM.DEIS3C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.83%

-30.78%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-5.62%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.85%

-30.47%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-19.18%

+13.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-9.04%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.42%

+0.26%

Volatility

XUEM.DE vs. IS3C.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) is 2.12%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that XUEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XUEM.DEIS3C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

2.99%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.20%

4.00%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.90%

6.96%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.78%

8.83%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.54%

9.25%

+1.29%