XUDV vs. YLDE
XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) and YLDE (ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF) are both Dividend funds. XUDV is passively managed, while YLDE is actively managed. Over the past year, XUDV returned 29.58% vs 13.89% for YLDE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUDV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for YLDE.
Performance
XUDV vs. YLDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 19.02% return, which is significantly higher than YLDE's 4.09% return.
XUDV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 19.02%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YLDE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- —
XUDV vs. YLDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 19.02% | 8.24% |
YLDE ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF | 4.09% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUDV and YLDE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XUDV and YLDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUDV vs. YLDE — Risk / Return Rank
XUDV
YLDE
XUDV vs. YLDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUDV | YLDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 1.84 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 6.84 | +9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUDV | YLDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.50 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.75 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
XUDV vs. YLDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum YLDE drawdown of -33.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and YLDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUDV | YLDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -33.23% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -7.59% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -2.54% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -3.55% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.03% | -0.17% |
Volatility
XUDV vs. YLDE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) at 1.81%. This indicates that XUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YLDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUDV | YLDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 1.81% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 6.74% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 9.31% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 13.50% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 15.76% | +0.58% |
XUDV vs. YLDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than YLDE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUDV vs. YLDE - Dividend Comparison
XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than YLDE's 7.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 3.48% | 3.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YLDE ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF | 7.04% | 5.68% | 1.69% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.15% | 1.46% | 1.65% | 2.25% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUDV and YLDE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XUDV has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to YLDE (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUDV dropped -15.98% vs YLDE's -33.23%.
On 1-year performance, XUDV leads with 29.58% vs 13.89% for YLDE. On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, YLDE has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XUDV has performed better with a 29.58% return vs 13.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for YLDE.
YLDE has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 3.48% for XUDV.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.60% for YLDE.
XUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XUDV and YLDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer