PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUDV vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUDV vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 17.63% return.


XUDV

1D
1.19%
1M
2.99%
6M
18.51%
YTD
25.74%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.60%

VYMI

1D
0.18%
1M
4.51%
6M
10.61%
YTD
17.63%
1Y
34.92%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
10.95%
ALL TIME*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.97M$82.29M$91.79M
$488.33K$320.23K$391.69K

XUDV vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XUDV and VYMI is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.56

The correlation between XUDV and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUDV vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUDV
VYMI

Financial Services

23.7%
42.4%

Technology

16.8%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

16.0%
6.7%

Industrials

8.4%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
6.0%

Healthcare

8.1%
6.5%

Communication Services

7.3%
3.5%

Energy

6.5%
7.9%

Utilities

4.0%
5.2%

Basic Materials

1.2%
6.5%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Financial Services

XUDV
23.7%
VYMI
42.4%

Technology

XUDV
16.8%
VYMI
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

XUDV
16.0%
VYMI
6.7%

Industrials

XUDV
8.4%
VYMI
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XUDV
8.1%
VYMI
6.0%

Healthcare

XUDV
8.1%
VYMI
6.5%

Communication Services

XUDV
7.3%
VYMI
3.5%

Energy

XUDV
6.5%
VYMI
7.9%

Utilities

XUDV
4.0%
VYMI
5.2%

Basic Materials

XUDV
1.2%
VYMI
6.5%

Real Estate

XUDV

-

VYMI
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUDV vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XUDV
XUDV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XUDV vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUDVVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.48

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.36

3.46

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.66

13.66

+5.00

XUDV vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUDV and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUDV vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUDVVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-40.00%

+24.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-10.14%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.33%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-6.22%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.56%

-0.74%

Volatility

XUDV vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUDVVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.40%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

11.31%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

13.24%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

14.85%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.55%

-0.57%

XUDV vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUDV vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than VYMI's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.47%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%
XUDV
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
3.32%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUDV and VYMI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYMI has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to XUDV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUDV dropped -15.98% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 1-year performance, VYMI leads with 34.92% vs 33.81% for XUDV. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 34.92% return vs 33.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XUDV.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 3.32% for XUDV.

XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.07% for VYMI.

XUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUDV and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer