XUDV vs. VYMI
XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) are both Dividend funds - XUDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index while VYMI tracks the FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XUDV returned 33.81% vs 34.92% for VYMI. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XUDV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VYMI.
Performance
XUDV vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 17.63% return.
XUDV
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.60%
VYMI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $79.97M | $82.29M | $91.79M | |
| $488.33K | $320.23K | $391.69K |
XUDV vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 25.74% | 8.52% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 17.63% | 35.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUDV and VYMI is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XUDV and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUDV vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUDV
VYMI
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
XUDV
VYMI
Technology
XUDV
VYMI
Consumer Defensive
XUDV
VYMI
Industrials
XUDV
VYMI
Consumer Cyclical
XUDV
VYMI
Healthcare
XUDV
VYMI
Communication Services
XUDV
VYMI
Energy
XUDV
VYMI
Utilities
XUDV
VYMI
Basic Materials
XUDV
VYMI
Real Estate
XUDV
-
VYMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUDV vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank
XUDV
VYMI
XUDV vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XUDV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.48 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.36 | 3.46 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.66 | 13.66 | +5.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XUDV vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and VYMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUDV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -40.00% | +24.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -10.14% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.33% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -6.22% | +4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.56% | -0.74% |
Volatility
XUDV vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUDV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.40% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 11.31% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 13.24% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 14.85% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 16.55% | -0.57% |
XUDV vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUDV vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison
XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than VYMI's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.47% | 3.68% | 4.84% | 4.58% | 4.70% | 4.30% | 3.22% | 4.20% | 4.29% | 3.21% | 2.39% |
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 3.32% | 3.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUDV and VYMI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VYMI has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to XUDV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUDV dropped -15.98% vs VYMI's -40.00%.
On 1-year performance, VYMI leads with 34.92% vs 33.81% for XUDV. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 34.92% return vs 33.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XUDV.
VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 3.32% for XUDV.
XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.07% for VYMI.
XUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XUDV and VYMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer