PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUDV vs. IVEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUDV vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XUDV

1D
1.19%
1M
2.99%
6M
18.51%
YTD
25.74%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.60%

IVEP

1D
2.37%
1M
-1.20%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$584.23K$598.82K$857.59K
$488.33K$320.23K$391.69K

XUDV vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XUDV and IVEP is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.22

XUDV vs. IVEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUDV
IVEP

Financial Services

23.7%

-

Technology

16.8%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

16.0%

-

Industrials

8.4%
45.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%

-

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Communication Services

7.3%

-

Energy

6.5%
12.5%

Utilities

4.0%
22.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.2%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Financial Services

XUDV
23.7%
IVEP

-

Technology

XUDV
16.8%
IVEP
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

XUDV
16.0%
IVEP

-

Industrials

XUDV
8.4%
IVEP
45.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XUDV
8.1%
IVEP

-

Healthcare

XUDV
8.1%
IVEP

-

Communication Services

XUDV
7.3%
IVEP

-

Energy

XUDV
6.5%
IVEP
12.5%

Utilities

XUDV
4.0%
IVEP
22.3%

Basic Materials

XUDV
1.2%
IVEP
2.2%

Real Estate

XUDV

-

IVEP
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUDV vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XUDV
XUDV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IVEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XUDV vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUDVIVEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.66

XUDV vs. IVEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUDV vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum IVEP drawdown of -17.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and IVEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUDVIVEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-17.54%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-9.78%

+9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-5.07%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

Volatility

XUDV vs. IVEP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUDVIVEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

31.49%

-19.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

31.49%

-15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

31.49%

-15.51%

XUDV vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUDV vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison

XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XUDV and IVEP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

XUDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

XUDV is categorized as Dividend, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.75% for IVEP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUDV and IVEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer