PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTWY vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTWY vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTWY achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than VTG's -0.43% return.


XTWY

1D
-0.60%
1M
-2.04%
6M
-2.41%
YTD
-1.89%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
-3.59%
5Y*
10Y*

VTG

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.53%
6M
-0.49%
YTD
-0.43%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTWY vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTWY and VTG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.90

The correlation between XTWY and VTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTWY vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTWY
XTWY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTWY vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTWYVTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.14

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.98

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

2.56

-2.10

XTWY vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the VTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWY and VTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTWY vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWY drawdown since its inception was -25.92%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWY and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTWYVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.92%

-2.89%

-23.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-2.89%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.55%

-2.21%

-14.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-0.83%

-11.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

1.10%

+3.09%

Volatility

XTWY vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) at 1.13%. This indicates that XTWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTWYVTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

1.13%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

2.64%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

3.53%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

3.53%

+13.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

3.53%

+13.95%

XTWY vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTWY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTWY vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

XTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than VTG's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.55%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTWY
BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.79%4.56%4.65%3.86%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTWY and VTG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTWY has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to VTG (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTWY dropped -25.92% vs VTG's -2.89%.

On 1-year performance, VTG leads with 2.81% vs 1.92% for XTWY. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTG has performed better with a 2.81% return vs 1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XTWY.

XTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.55% for VTG.

XTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 20 Year Target Duration Index, while VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XTWY and 0.03% for VTG.

VTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTWY and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer