XTWY vs. SCHQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XTWY (BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - XTWY tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 20 Year Target Duration Index while SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTWY returned -3.12%/yr vs -0.57%/yr for SCHQ. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XTWY charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.

Performance

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTWY achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's 0.02% return.

XTWY

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.04%
• 6M: -1.90%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: -3.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHQ

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: -1.05%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: -0.57%
• 5Y*: -4.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XTWY BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	0.04%	2.52%	-10.25%	2.73%	-8.01%
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	0.02%	5.50%	-6.44%	3.43%	-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XTWY and SCHQ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022	0.98

The correlation between XTWY and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XTWY vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTWY

XTWY Risk / Return Rank: 14
XTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
XTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 14
XTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
XTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 14

SCHQ

SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 18
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTWY	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	0.63	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	0.96	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.11	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	0.66	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	1.73	-0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWY and SCHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTWY	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	0.63	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	-0.25	+0.04

Drawdowns

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWY drawdown since its inception was -25.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWY and SCHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTWY	SCHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.92%	-46.13%	+20.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.48%	-7.01%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.16%	-17.65%	-4.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.91%	-36.53%	+21.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-26.35%	+14.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	2.68%	+1.22%

Volatility

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) at 2.63%. This indicates that XTWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTWY	SCHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	2.63%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	6.03%	+1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.76%	8.96%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	14.54%	+3.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	15.34%	+2.30%

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTWY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XTWY vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

XTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, less than SCHQ's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	4.77%	4.54%	4.58%	3.79%	2.88%	1.69%	1.51%	0.44%
XTWY BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	4.68%	4.56%	4.65%	3.86%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTWY and SCHQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, XTWY and SCHQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XTWY or SCHQ?

XTWY has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to SCHQ (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTWY dropped -25.92% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.

Which ETF is better, XTWY or SCHQ?

On 3-year performance, SCHQ leads with -0.57% vs -3.12% for XTWY. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTWY or SCHQ?

Over the 3-year period, SCHQ has performed better with a -0.57% return vs -3.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTWY or SCHQ?

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XTWY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTWY or SCHQ?

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.68% for XTWY.

What is the main difference between XTWY and SCHQ?

XTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 20 Year Target Duration Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XTWY and 0.03% for SCHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.