PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTWY vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTWY vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTWY achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 1.81% return.


XTWY

1D
0.11%
1M
2.79%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.48%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
-3.26%
5Y*
10Y*

TFLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.91%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
2.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTWY vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTWY
BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.98%2.52%-10.25%2.73%-7.81%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.81%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XTWY and TFLO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTWY vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTWY
XTWY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTWY vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTWYTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-50.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

14.01

-12.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

202.27

-201.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

827.47

-826.53

XTWY vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 14.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWY and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTWY vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWY drawdown since its inception was -25.92%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWY and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTWYTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.92%

-5.01%

-20.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-0.02%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-0.04%

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.11%

0.00%

-14.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-0.10%

-12.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

0.00%

+4.09%

Volatility

XTWY vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.08%. This indicates that XTWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTWYTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

0.08%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

0.20%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

0.29%

+11.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

0.35%

+17.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

0.46%

+17.08%

XTWY vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTWY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLO's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTWY vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

XTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than TFLO's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.89%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%
XTWY
BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.63%4.56%4.65%3.86%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTWY and TFLO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTWY has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to TFLO (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTWY dropped -25.92% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

On 3-year performance, TFLO leads with 4.72% vs -3.26% for XTWY. On fees, XTWY is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TFLO has performed better with a 4.72% return vs -3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTWY is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TFLO.

XTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 3.89% for TFLO.

XTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 20 Year Target Duration Index, while TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XTWY and 0.15% for TFLO.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.11 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTWY and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer