PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTWO vs. XFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTWO vs. XFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTWO vs. XFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTWO
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.27%5.17%3.92%4.27%0.17%
XFIV
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.04%7.43%1.52%4.40%-0.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTWO achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than XFIV's -0.04% return.


XTWO

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
0.27%
6M
1.41%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
10Y*

XFIV

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTWO vs. XFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTWO and XFIV have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XTWO vs. XFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTWO
XTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XFIV
XFIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTWO vs. XFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTWOXFIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

1.07

+1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.86

1.59

+2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.19

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

1.76

+2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.27

5.42

+9.85

XTWO vs. XFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the XFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWO and XFIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTWOXFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.07

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.65

+1.13

Correlation

The correlation between XTWO and XFIV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XTWO vs. XFIV - Dividend Comparison

XTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than XFIV's 3.95% yield.


Drawdowns

XTWO vs. XFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWO drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum XFIV drawdown of -6.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWO and XFIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTWOXFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-6.38%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.91%

-2.48%

+1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-1.72%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-1.65%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.81%

-0.56%

Volatility

XTWO vs. XFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) is 0.56%, while Bondbloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that XTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTWOXFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

1.36%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

2.36%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56%

3.93%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

5.51%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

5.51%

-3.31%