XTWO vs. VGLT
XTWO (BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - XTWO tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 2 Year Target Duration Index while VGLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTWO returned 4.20%/yr vs -0.04%/yr for VGLT. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XTWO charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGLT.
Performance
XTWO vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTWO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's -2.90% return.
XTWO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 2.55%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.66%
VGLT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- -1.31%
- 3Y*
- -0.04%
- 5Y*
- -7.20%
- 10Y*
- -1.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $99.02M | $99.81M | $109.19M | |
| $4.33M | $4.70M | $2.37M |
XTWO vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTWO BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 0.74% | 5.17% | 3.92% | 4.27% | 0.14% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -2.90% | 5.35% | -6.28% | 3.27% | -6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTWO and VGLT is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XTWO and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTWO vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank
XTWO
VGLT
XTWO vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTWO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.98 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | -0.19 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | -0.41 | +9.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTWO vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTWO drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWO and VGLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTWO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -46.18% | +44.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.91% | -7.03% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.18% | -13.38% | +12.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -38.41% | +38.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -15.27% | +14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | 3.22% | -2.95% |
Volatility
XTWO vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) is 0.34%, while Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that XTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTWO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 2.30% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.27% | 6.31% | -5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 8.39% | -6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 14.46% | -12.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 13.75% | -11.58% |
XTWO vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTWO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XTWO vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison
XTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than VGLT's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.78% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
XTWO BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 4.24% | 4.54% | 4.07% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTWO and VGLT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGLT has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to XTWO (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTWO dropped -1.73% vs VGLT's -46.18%.
On 3-year performance, XTWO leads with 4.20% vs -0.04% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XTWO has performed better with a 4.20% return vs -0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for XTWO.
VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.97% for XTWO.
XTWO tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 2 Year Target Duration Index, while VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XTWO and 0.03% for VGLT.
XTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTWO and VGLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer