PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTR vs. SNTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTR vs. SNTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than SNTH's 10.28% return.


XTR

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.03%
YTD
8.67%
6M
8.51%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
10Y*

SNTH

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.21%
YTD
10.28%
6M
9.02%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR vs. SNTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
8.67%19.66%
SNTH
MRP SynthEquity ETF
10.28%23.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XTR and SNTH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025

0.96

The correlation between XTR and SNTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTR vs. SNTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR
XTR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SNTH
SNTH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. SNTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTRSNTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.18

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.51

11.05

+0.46

XTR vs. SNTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SNTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR and SNTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTRSNTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.30

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.87

-1.15

Drawdowns

XTR vs. SNTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than SNTH's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and SNTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTRSNTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-9.79%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-8.99%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.70%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-1.96%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.59%

-0.60%

Volatility

XTR vs. SNTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) is 2.99%, while MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that XTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTRSNTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.19%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

8.41%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

12.47%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

15.54%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.78%

15.54%

-1.76%

XTR vs. SNTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SNTH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTR vs. SNTH - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, more than SNTH's 10.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SNTH
MRP SynthEquity ETF
10.91%11.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
16.40%17.82%20.89%1.09%1.08%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, XTR and SNTH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNTH has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to XTR (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs SNTH's -9.79%.

On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 28.52% vs 22.85% for XTR. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 28.52% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SNTH.

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 10.91% for SNTH.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and MRP. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.95% for SNTH.

SNTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTR and SNTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer