XTR vs. SNTH
XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) and SNTH (MRP SynthEquity ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. XTR is passively managed, while SNTH is actively managed. Over the past year, XTR returned 22.85% vs 28.52% for SNTH. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XTR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SNTH.
Performance
XTR vs. SNTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than SNTH's 10.28% return.
XTR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNTH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 28.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTR vs. SNTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 8.67% | 19.66% |
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF | 10.28% | 23.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTR and SNTH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XTR and SNTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTR vs. SNTH — Risk / Return Rank
XTR
SNTH
XTR vs. SNTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTR | SNTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.18 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 11.05 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTR | SNTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.30 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.87 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
XTR vs. SNTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than SNTH's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and SNTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTR | SNTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -9.79% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -8.99% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.70% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -1.96% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.59% | -0.60% |
Volatility
XTR vs. SNTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) is 2.99%, while MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that XTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTR | SNTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 3.19% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 8.41% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 12.47% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 15.54% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 15.54% | -1.76% |
XTR vs. SNTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SNTH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTR vs. SNTH - Dividend Comparison
XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, more than SNTH's 10.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF | 10.91% | 11.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 16.40% | 17.82% | 20.89% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XTR and SNTH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SNTH has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to XTR (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs SNTH's -9.79%.
On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 28.52% vs 22.85% for XTR. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 28.52% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SNTH.
XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 10.91% for SNTH.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and MRP. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.95% for SNTH.
SNTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTR and SNTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer