SNTH vs. PHDG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SNTH (MRP SynthEquity ETF) and PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. SNTH is actively managed, while PHDG is passively managed. Over the past year, SNTH returned 18.49% vs 18.23% for PHDG. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SNTH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PHDG.

Performance

SNTH vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTH achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 10.21% return.

SNTH

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -0.81%
• 6M: 5.99%
• YTD: 7.02%
• 1Y: 18.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.81%

PHDG

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 8.71%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 1Y: 18.23%
• 3Y*: 8.48%
• 5Y*: 4.25%
• 10Y*: 7.28%
• ALL TIME*: 5.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	$1.18M	$678.43K	$904.25K
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	$2.58M	$2.34M	$2.64M

SNTH vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	7.02%	24.27%
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	10.21%	3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTH and PHDG is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2025	0.61

The correlation between SNTH and PHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SNTH vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNTH

SNTH Risk / Return Rank: 49
SNTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SNTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SNTH Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SNTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SNTH Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PHDG

PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 66
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNTH vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNTH	PHDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.45	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.05	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.29	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.46	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	7.58	-1.77

SNTH vs. PHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the PHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTH and PHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNTH vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTH drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum PHDG drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTH and PHDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNTH	PHDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-17.70%	+7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-6.78%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.63%	-5.31%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-6.23%	+4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	2.20%	+0.65%

Volatility

SNTH vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison

MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) at 2.51%. This indicates that SNTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNTH	PHDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	2.51%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	9.48%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.35%	11.50%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	11.39%	+4.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	12.11%	+3.49%

SNTH vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNTH vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison

SNTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than PHDG's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	1.68%	2.10%	1.94%	1.93%	1.35%	0.44%	0.63%	1.80%	1.56%	1.83%	2.29%	1.64%
SNTH MRP SynthEquity ETF	11.72%	11.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNTH and PHDG in my portfolio?

SNTH and PHDG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNTH or PHDG?

SNTH has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to PHDG (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTH dropped -9.79% vs PHDG's -17.70%.

Which ETF is better, SNTH or PHDG?

On 1-year performance, SNTH leads with 18.49% vs 18.23% for PHDG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PHDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNTH or PHDG?

Over the 1-year period, SNTH has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 18.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNTH or PHDG?

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SNTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNTH or PHDG?

SNTH has the higher dividend yield at 11.72%, compared with 1.68% for PHDG.

What is the main difference between SNTH and PHDG?

They also come from different issuers: MRP and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SNTH and 0.39% for PHDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.