XTR vs. RFLR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR).

XTR and RFLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. RFLR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 17, 2024.

Performance

XTR vs. RFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XTR vs. RFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	-4.49%	13.66%	3.67%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	2.50%	11.81%	2.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than RFLR's 2.50% return.

XTR

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.87%
• YTD: -4.49%
• 6M: -3.05%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RFLR

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 5.11%
• 1Y: 22.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR vs. RFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

RFLR

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF

XTR

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

Return for Risk

XTR vs. RFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR

XTR Risk / Return Rank: 57
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

RFLR

RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 88
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. RFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTR	RFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.87	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.66	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.34	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	3.93	-2.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	12.87	-6.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTR vs. RFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the RFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR and RFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTR	RFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.87	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.89	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between XTR and RFLR is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XTR vs. RFLR - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.66%, more than RFLR's 0.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	18.66%	17.82%	20.89%	1.09%	1.08%	2.32%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	0.65%	0.67%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XTR vs. RFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than RFLR's maximum drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and RFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTR	RFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.83%	-15.48%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-5.79%	-2.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.17%	-2.76%	-3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-4.20%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	1.77%	+0.46%

Volatility

XTR vs. RFLR - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTR	RFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	4.46%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	9.66%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.17%	12.21%	+0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.87%	12.32%	+1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.87%	12.32%	+1.55%